W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > June 2010

Re: CURIEs / QNames

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:28:13 +0200
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6857EC97-C3B6-406D-A57F-BCA6918D88BB@w3.org>
To: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
On 15 Jun 2010, at 19:55, Scott Cantor wrote:

> Thomas, I'm assuming this is the spec you were referring to?
> http://www.w3.org/TR/curie/
> I reviewed it briefly and I guess my reaction is that it seems to be
> proposing something that's very much like QNames (in that it has the prefix
> problem), but is definitely formally distinct.

Mostly; also:

Note the prefix construct and the continued reliance on CURIES.

It would be great if you could have a quick look at how this affects c14n 2.0.

(I suppose that takes care of ACTION-595, in fact.)
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 21:28:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:14 UTC