W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2010

RE: RNG schema plans

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:37:57 -0500
To: "'MURATA Makoto \(FAMILY Given\)'" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "'XMLSec WG Public List'" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005c01ca991d$5fac5030$1f04f090$@2@osu.edu>
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote on 2010-01-19:
>>  About what? The existing schema, whatever it's faults, is not unclear
>> about wildcards.
> The propse says more than what the schema says by <xsd:any/>.  And that
> part of the prose does not look clear to me.

I'm asking what doesn't look clear, that was my question. What more does the
prose say that's confusing?

> In general, I think that every syntactical constraint not captured
> by schemas but captured by prose should be very carefully stated.

Should be, sure, but not this late in the process.

-- Scott
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 15:38:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:13 UTC