W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:06:01 +0100
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, "Cynthia E. Martin" <cemartin@mitre.org>
Message-Id: <3BF19AD3-A4ED-4429-9AE1-1E7D8C5DDC1B@w3.org>
To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
On 8 Jan 2010, at 17:02, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> Yes,  Does an obsoleted one indicate the new RFC to be used, I think so.

The RFC index does, the (text version of) the RFC doesn't.  There are nicely instrumented pages on tools.ietf.org that make all this a bit more navigable.

> Regardless, it sounds like we should not make a change here to the reference until RFC 3161 is superseded. Referencing the update draft does not sound like the correct change.

We could add a note that points at the draft.
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 16:06:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 8 January 2010 16:06:04 GMT