W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:06:35 -0500
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, "Cynthia E. Martin" <cemartin@mitre.org>
Message-Id: <7F710026-E577-4B47-9EA8-53BF169EEF6E@nokia.com>
To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Yes I thought about adding a note. I think that is ok since the  
document will continue revision. I'll go ahead and add it.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Jan 8, 2010, at 11:06 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 8 Jan 2010, at 17:02, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
>> Yes,  Does an obsoleted one indicate the new RFC to be used, I  
>> think so.
> The RFC index does, the (text version of) the RFC doesn't.  There  
> are nicely instrumented pages on tools.ietf.org that make all this a  
> bit more navigable.
>> Regardless, it sounds like we should not make a change here to the  
>> reference until RFC 3161 is superseded. Referencing the update  
>> draft does not sound like the correct change.
> We could add a note that points at the draft.
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 17:07:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:13 UTC