W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [urgent] XML Signature 2.0 namespace?

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:24:44 +0200
Cc: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <37401CCE-2A3B-43BC-9AF3-C10832614B47@w3.org>
To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
On 21 Oct 2009, at 23:18, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> instead of experimental why not xmldsig2, so we don't have to change  
> it later. experimental is not very meaningful
> e.g.
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/xmldsig2#

My guess is that we'll be changing this significantly and that it's  
too early to give it a "meaningful" namespace.  Hence the question.

If we think that we should use a "final" namespace, then I'd propose / 
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 21:24:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:12 UTC