W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [urgent] XML Signature 2.0 namespace?

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:31:11 -0400
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2AAD1F9B-4EED-4C83-BFAA-BB885AC119EA@nokia.com>
To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
yes that is better, given that it is FPWD why don' t we use that,  
along with note that it is subject to change.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:24 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 21 Oct 2009, at 23:18, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
>
>> instead of experimental why not xmldsig2, so we don't have to change
>> it later. experimental is not very meaningful
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/xmldsig2#
>
> My guess is that we'll be changing this significantly and that it's
> too early to give it a "meaningful" namespace.  Hence the question.
>
> If we think that we should use a "final" namespace, then I'd propose /
> 2009/xmldsig2#
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 21:31:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:00 GMT