W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2009


From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:51:41 -0400
To: XMLSec WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-id: <4ACC9CED.5070409@sun.com>
While working on the implementation of DEREncodedKeyValue [1], I am curious as 
to why we didn't define (or recommend that) this be a child element of the 
existing KeyValue element? We must have discussed this before but I don't 
remember. It would seem to be a better place for it, as it is intended to hold a 
single public key (same as a KeyValue) and it would fit nicely in the existing 
Java APIs for KeyValue, where the underlying DER encoding does not necessarily 
need to be exposed to the programmer.

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core1/#sec-DEREncodedKeyValue
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 13:52:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:12 UTC