W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Status of ISSUE-92, implicitCA for ECKeyValueType and ECDomainParameterType?

From: Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:21:16 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0907271001520.7660@W-JNISBETTEST-1.tablus.com>
Frederick,

My recollection is:

- For "implicitCA" we have agreement that it is not needed for now.

- For the separate type, we agreed to the wording in the current draft and 
to wait for any reviewer feedback (with the default assumption that if no 
feedback in support for the alternative design is received, the current 
text will stand).

-- Magnus

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> Have we resolved this issue:
>
> [OPEN] ISSUE-92 : Include the \"implicitCA\" option for ECKeyValueType and 
> separate ECDomainParameterType type
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/92
>
> if not, what do we have to do to resolve it?
>
> Can someone please summarize the issue and where we are with it, given the 
> language in the current XML Signature 1.1 draft?
>
> Thanks
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair XML Security WG
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 08:21:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:59 GMT