I have updated the XML Encryption 1.1 and XML Signature 1.1 Editors drafts and associated red-lines. The original XML Encryption Recommendation apparently had a number of spelling errors as noted recently on our list [1]. I have fixed these in the update to XML Encryption 1.1. We may wish to also list these as errata against the original recommendation. http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/ http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview_diff.htm I also fixed spelling in XML Signature 1.1 as well, however other editorial issues remain for discussion [2]. http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/ http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview_diff.htm There seems to be an issue with the W3C HTML diff tool placing an inappropriate xml declaration at the start of diffs it produces [3]. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jan/0031.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jan/0032.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiffReceived on Friday, 16 January 2009 22:57:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:57 GMT