Juan Carlos Cruellas wrote: > > "The optional Type attribute denotes the actually digested item, not > it's contents" seems OK to me. > > In addition to that, should not we change the next sentence?: > > "For example, a reference that identifies an |Object| element > containing a |SignatureProperties| element is still of type |#Object|" > > by > > "For example, a reference that does not contain any transform and that > identifies an |Object| element containing a |SignatureProperties| > element is still of type |#Object|" > > As if there is some transform in the ds:Reference element then what is > digested and signed might not be a ds:Object anymore... I think what you want to say is "For example, a reference that does not contain any transform or post transform results to an |Object| element containing a |SignatureProperties| element is still of type |#Object|"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:59 GMT