W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate.

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:16:14 +0200
To: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org, public-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070619151614.GC3883@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>


On 2007-06-18 18:38:32 +0000, Richard Salz wrote:

> Could it have to do with preserving the value no matter the setting (if 
> any) of xml:space ?
>         /r$

I would suspect so.

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 15:16:22 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Salz: "Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51)"
Previous message: Thomas Roessler: "Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51)"
In reply to: Richard Salz: "RE: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate."
Next in thread: Konrad Lanz: "Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:00 GMT