W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org > August 2012

Re: use cases

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:05:27 +0100
Message-ID: <5031EFC7.30202@nag.co.uk>
To: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
CC: "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, "public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org" <public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org>
On 20/08/2012 01:37, Rushforth, Peter wrote:
> If the information in an unobtrusive namespaces file can be
> retrieved/created by xslt from an xml+namespaces document, should it
> not be reasonably possible that the result of processing a
> namespace-free document + a unobtrusive namespace file be equivalent
> to the result of an xml processor processing the equivalent
> xml+namespaces document ie effectively no data model differences?

That was my original understanding of Liam's proposal which was why I
questioned the usage which appeared to be specifying namespaces for
unprefixed attributes, as there is no equivalent for that in standard
xml+namespace processing.

Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 08:05:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:44:53 UTC