W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2015

the case for p:sign step ?

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:51:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mtPjKMBis0ZH6cR32pS4foeyP_T5XJLeoSU=8D2T4+7eQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
In my travels for satisfying other actions, I noticed an older use
case (as described by Henry)

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Feb/0062.html

this is also annotated in the interim artifact

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Feb/0062.html

any thoughts on p:sign for XProv v2 ? Do we need to add to our current
requirements doc ?

http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-v2-req/

J
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 10:51:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 28 January 2015 10:51:35 UTC