W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Use case 5.11 - Possible?

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:29:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CABp3FNL0jwy15_3KeQFCxoYxj+DL7pFpET2NwTNqiXwA+npn9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Norm just pointed out section 2.8:

http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#psvi-support

So possible, but ...

My bad.


On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:

> Henry's use case for making absolute URIs (5.11 [1]) relies on the base
> URI and schema type information residing in the "infoset" as properties.  I
> don't think we can do this today without saying that we have the XDM and
> ensuring that the information from both xml:base processing and validation
> is preserved by XProc.  Certainly, xml:base should be fine based on what
> our 1.0 specification says but the type information that allows inspection
> of each attribute isn't.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> I think this needs to be marked as a possibility for V.next.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-requirements/#use-case-make-absolute-urls
>
> --
> --Alex Milowski
> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
> considered."
>
> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
>



-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 16:29:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 March 2013 16:29:55 GMT