- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:54:19 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
> At today's XProc telcon, we attempt to return to the question of our
> strategic vision for v.next. With our eyes focused on usability and
> adoption, consensus seemed to be forming around a short list:
>
> 1. Fix parameters.
> 2. Allow non-XML documents to flow through.
> 3. Consider a compact syntax.
> 4. Consider allowing implicit declarations.
> 5. Groups of new steps (as notes)
>
> In roughly that order, I think.
>
> Anyone think other things belong on that list, or want to veto any of
> those?
That covers my main concerns, IIRC.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 16:54:55 UTC