W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: A parameters alternative

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:34:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mua4WD3-SE5b+Lz_wzBEteyuf8RzbaDn1ygnxmqbEiN4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Suppose we said that parameters were named collections of key/value pairs.
> The XProc context includes by default two such named collections:
> p:global - initialized by some implementation-defined mechanism to contain
>       all the parameters passed to the pipeline by the user.
> p:none  - initialized to be empty
> Implementations may provide a mechanism to create other named collections.
> We update p:parameters so that it adds/replaces keys to the collection it names.
> We remove parameter input ports in favor of a parameters option that takes
> a list of named collections. If no parameters option is specified, p:global
> is assumed.
> If we add types to options, we can make "parameters" a special type.

I was thinking along the same lines  but to make an offering to the
gods of reuse perhaps we could just call it 'map' then params become
less exceptional ?

Or am I missing something ?

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 11:34:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:50 UTC