W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: p:data and p:load

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:12:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mu4VL_BZEHYoTCGBw1eVsRK0TMfdPhq=ko-rpJvnzyJQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes:
>> p:data is a lot more sophisticated in terms of handling non xml data
>> and I was wondering if it would be worth harmonising p:load
>> which could result in us adopting p:data attributes as p:option (and
>> implicit wrapping behavior) or redefining the step with a non primary
>> input port
>> which uses p:data ?
> Yes. We added p:data late in the process. I think we should consider
> some sort of harmonization in V.next. We should at least follow the
> model of XSLT 3.0 and attempt to make JSON support first-class, even
> if we don't go "all the way" to make arbitrary data first-class.

sounds like a plan and something to add to discuss.

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 20:12:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:49 UTC