Re: p:data and p:load

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes:
>> p:data is a lot more sophisticated in terms of handling non xml data
>> and I was wondering if it would be worth harmonising p:load
>> which could result in us adopting p:data attributes as p:option (and
>> implicit wrapping behavior) or redefining the step with a non primary
>> input port
>> which uses p:data ?
>
> Yes. We added p:data late in the process. I think we should consider
> some sort of harmonization in V.next. We should at least follow the
> model of XSLT 3.0 and attempt to make JSON support first-class, even
> if we don't go "all the way" to make arbitrary data first-class.

sounds like a plan and something to add to discuss.

J

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 20:12:43 UTC