- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:03:37 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Sorry, should have read all my email first. I've now seen the clarification. p. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml- > processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul > Sent: Friday, 2011 February 04 9:01 > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: XProc Minutes 3 Feb 2011 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml- > > processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson > > Sent: Thursday, 2011 February 03 16:24 > > To: Norman Walsh > > Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > > Subject: Re: XProc Minutes 3 Feb 2011 > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Norman Walsh writes: > > > > > See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/03-minutes > > > . . . > > > Henry: Does any one know if the widely used processors support > the > > > namespace attributes property? > > > > > > Norm: The Java processors based on JAXP don't. > > > > > > Henry: Some of the Python one's do. Whether they should or not > is > > an > > > another question. > > > > This got a bit garbled. What I asked was: do commonly-used > processors > > report "xmlns:...=..." as [attributes] or [namespace attributes]. > you > > said you thought the Java ones did. I said I thought the Python XML > > api didn't. > > Still ambiguous. Did/didn't what? > > Java ones do report them as [attributes], Python doesn't report > them as [attributes] but reports them as [namespace attributes]? > > Or the other way around? > > Or Java ones do report them as [attributes] or [namespace attributes] > but Python doesn't report them as either? > > paul >
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 15:04:09 UTC