W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2011

RE: XProc Minutes 3 Feb 2011

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:03:37 -0500
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA020A9A2B@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Sorry, should have read all my email first.  I've
now seen the clarification.

p.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-xml-
> processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Friday, 2011 February 04 9:01
> To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: XProc Minutes 3 Feb 2011
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-xml-
> > processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson
> > Sent: Thursday, 2011 February 03 16:24
> > To: Norman Walsh
> > Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: XProc Minutes 3 Feb 2011
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Norman Walsh writes:
> >
> > > See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/03-minutes
> > > . . .
> > >    Henry: Does any one know if the widely used processors support
> the
> > >    namespace attributes property?
> > >
> > >    Norm: The Java processors based on JAXP don't.
> > >
> > >    Henry: Some of the Python one's do. Whether they should or not
> is
> > an
> > >    another question.
> >
> > This got a bit garbled.  What I asked was: do commonly-used
> processors
> > report "xmlns:...=..." as [attributes] or [namespace attributes].
> you
> > said you thought the Java ones did.  I said I thought the Python XML
> > api didn't.
> 
> Still ambiguous.  Did/didn't what?
> 
> Java ones do report them as [attributes], Python doesn't report
> them as [attributes] but reports them as [namespace attributes]?
> 
> Or the other way around?
> 
> Or Java ones do report them as [attributes] or [namespace attributes]
> but Python doesn't report them as either?
> 
> paul
> 
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 15:04:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 February 2011 15:04:09 GMT