W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > December 2011

RE: xml processor profiles diagram

From: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:34:56 -0500
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3799D0FD120AD940B731A37E36DAF3FE33FEF695B7@MX20A.corp.emc.com>
> > However, there is no class that would correspond to the other yelow
> set (xml:id). Should we have one?
> 
> I think this is a better representation then the first one I made and
> whilst I am happy to make any changes anyone suggests I do think the
> diagram in its present form gives some value to the reader.

Absolutely - I am not arguing with that. Nor was I criticizing the diagram (no doubt a lot of time and thought went into it). It probably cannot be made much simpler given the current specification - I was just wondering if that is OK, or if it is a symptom of some loose ends in the specification.

> As this
> diagram probably represents the pinnacle of my design career, beware
> that any 'furniture moving' at this stage may cause my brain to melt.

Who knows, maybe your design career has just started.

Regards,
Vojtech
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 14:35:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 December 2011 14:35:40 GMT