- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:25:13 +0100
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > I'm not happy with this change at the beginning of the Conformance section: > An XML processor may conform to one or more of the profiles defined > in this specification, depending on feature sets provided, supported > specifications and faithful description of how the processor is > configured > > The point this para. was intended to convey was _just_ that one > processor might conform to more than one profile, depending on > configuration. The proposed additional material just confuses things, > in my opinion. as the first paragraph of the conformance section I read the previous paragraph as being incomplete, e.g. that conformance was solely based on an XML processor configuration and thought including all 3 dependencies e.g. feature set, supported specs *and* configuration made it unambiguous. > I also find the new next paragraph confusing. Could we have instead > simply > > Conformance conditions for each profile are specified in the > corresponding sub-section of [ref. Section 2]. sure that was the source for this para, happy to replace with what you have suggested. J
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 12:25:41 UTC