Re: parameters

"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:
>> I noticed (because I broke it :-) that the test suite expects the
>> p:parameters step to insert a namespace attribute even when the
>> parameter is in no namespace:
>> 
>>   <c:param namespace="" name="input1" value="value2"/>
>> 
>> versus
>> 
>>   <c:param name="input1" value="value2"/>
>> 
>> Did we mean for that to be the case, or is that just an accident of
>> implementation?
>
> The latter. Actually, Calumet used to not generate the namespace
> attribute for parameters in no namespace initially, but then a couple of
> tests were written that depended on that behavior. I could either make
> you change Calabash or change Calumet. I decided to change my own code
> to make the whole process simpler for both of us :) Both creating the
> empty namespace attribute and omitting it are correct, it is just the
> way the tests were written.

I'm game for changing my implementation if you are. I don't think
there's any argument that either result should be a "pass", but for
the sake of our limited harness, it'll be easier if we both do the
same thing :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | He that shuns trifles must shun the
http://nwalsh.com/            | world.--George Chapman