W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Source input on p:filter

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:05:22 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bfx33dt71.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> writes:
>> Well... I don't think that we screwed up
>>
>> We were consistent in having step that take one document and let the
>> user manage himself the iteration (like the proposal you gave)
>
> Well, ok, but I think it's very inconsistent that p:identity accepts
> a sequence and p:filter doesn't. I'm just saying.

I recall that we made an exception for p:identity since it is needed
as a placeholder in certain circumstances where you may not know (yet)
whether a sequence is impending. . .

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLwMvykjnJixAXWBoRAj2aAJ4rGF6EHMQUYCovrxy2gfGXG7FPHACfedyF
a7WtPE5wNOiaJ6iunIqjxuo=
=Fil/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:05:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:05:53 GMT