- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:49:55 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Well.. I would continue to argue that p:identity is a special case because, there is no difference in with respect to processing a document or a sequence of document :-) Mohamed On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> writes: >> Well... I don't think that we screwed up >> >> We were consistent in having step that take one document and let the >> user manage himself the iteration (like the proposal you gave) > > Well, ok, but I think it's very inconsistent that p:identity accepts > a sequence and p:filter doesn't. I'm just saying. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If all mankind were to disappear, the > http://nwalsh.com/ | world would regenerate back to the rich > | state of equilibrium that existed ten > | thousand years ago. If insects were to > | vanish, the environment would collapse > | into chaos.--Edward O. Wilson > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:50:27 UTC