W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Source input on p:filter

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:49:55 +0200
Message-ID: <r2j546c6c1c1004100949m28c265bp79ad23818fe19ec0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Well.. I would continue to argue that p:identity is a special case
because, there is no difference in with respect to processing a
document or a sequence of document :-)

Mohamed

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> writes:
>> Well... I don't think that we screwed up
>>
>> We were consistent in having step that take one document and let the
>> user manage himself the iteration (like the proposal you gave)
>
> Well, ok, but I think it's very inconsistent that p:identity accepts
> a sequence and p:filter doesn't. I'm just saying.
>
>                    Be seeing you,
>                     norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If all mankind were to disappear, the
> http://nwalsh.com/      | world would regenerate back to the rich
>               | state of equilibrium that existed ten
>               | thousand years ago. If insects were to
>               | vanish, the environment would collapse
>               | into chaos.--Edward O. Wilson
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:50:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:50:28 GMT