W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2009

RE: Test suite coverage update

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:22:14 -0400
Message-ID: <997C307BEB90984EBE935699389EC41C037D37@CORPUSMX70C.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> "Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:
> [...]
> > Just a question. If the pipeline document had a base URI
> > http://example.com/pipeline.xpl, should the following also 
> work (without
> > re-requesting the document again)?
> If you specify anything more than just the fragment, I don't think you
> can gaurantee that the document won't be requested again. At least, I
> don't think it would be wrong *to* request the document again in that
> case.
> "#foo" is a special case.

OK. But now I am wondering whether the test pipeinfo-001.xml has
actually anything to do with p:pipeinfo at all. As far as I can tell, it
can be applied to any element in the pipeline, not just p:pipeinfo...
Also, the p:pipeinfo elements may be simply ignored by Xproc processors,
so the test may be actually questionable. Although on the XML level, it
is probably right. Not sure.

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 07:23:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:47 UTC