Re: ACTION-2008-08-28-03: the kinds of nodes that are legal for all steps

"Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes:

>> - Proposal to change p:insert, but I don't think that works for the reasons
>>  I cited above.
>>
>
> Well I don't agree
> What about Richard argument in http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/08/28-
> minutes
> [[
> I like Richard's formulation: p:insert allows matching of anything
>   which may have children if where is first or last, and anything that _is_
>   a child if where is before or after
> ]]

But your insert *must* include an element, so there's no value in
doing that, is there? Inserting an element into a document node guarantees
that the result is not WF XML.

Or am I not making any sense?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | All knowledge is of itself of some
http://nwalsh.com/            | value. There is nothing so minute or
                              | inconsiderable, that I would not rather
                              | know it than not.--Dr. Johnson