W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Extension functions or system properties

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 10:20:26 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m24p98g9n9.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Henry used p:psvi-available() in his recent example. That got me
thinking. We have a mixture of system properties and extension
functions and I don't think we've made any sort of consistent choice
about which is which.

Looking at our list of system properties, I wonder if we should promote
p:episode, p:language, p:xpath-version and p:psvi-supported (as well,
perhaps, as p:psvi-available) to extension functions.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is not failure of others to
http://nwalsh.com/            | appreciate your abilities that should
                              | trouble you, but rather your failure to
                              | appreciate theirs.-- Confucius

Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:21:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:46 UTC