W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: p:import-schema

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:49:38 -0700
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2prp2cbv1.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh writes:
|
|> / Toman_Vojtech@emc.com was heard to say:
|> | If I read the spec correctly, schema definitions from schema A are
|> | available in the nested pipeline. But what about the other way around? I
|> | would say that in the scope of the nested pipeline, the schema
|> | definitions from schema B will be "merged" with A, but they will not be
|> | visible in the top-level pipeline. Is this correct?
|>
|> Nope. As spec'd right now, they're all merged into one great big bag
|> and they're all visible everywhere.
|
| Hmm.  See minutes of yesterday's non-meeting for evidence that it
| didn't read that way to us. . .

I would, but instead I'm composing a message that argues we shouldn't
have p:import-schema *at all* in V1 :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The reverse side also has a reverse
http://nwalsh.com/            | side.

Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 13:50:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 July 2008 13:50:25 GMT