W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: p:import-schema

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:44:12 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b7iba5b9v.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> / Toman_Vojtech@emc.com was heard to say:
> | If I read the spec correctly, schema definitions from schema A are
> | available in the nested pipeline. But what about the other way around? I
> | would say that in the scope of the nested pipeline, the schema
> | definitions from schema B will be "merged" with A, but they will not be
> | visible in the top-level pipeline. Is this correct?
>
> Nope. As spec'd right now, they're all merged into one great big bag
> and they're all visible everywhere.

Hmm.  See minutes of yesterday's non-meeting for evidence that it
didn't read that way to us. . .

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIidiskjnJixAXWBoRAjG/AJ9b98jzs9smn56G4mUbwMbkVrc3+gCfbJkd
gAvjE6Il22xaQdWBBd76pLU=
=ni7m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 13:44:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 July 2008 13:44:50 GMT