W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: 4.4.1 p:xpath-context

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:36:19 -0700
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2k5fdbqrg.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Ok, I can see the benefit
|
| But why on p:xpath-context only ? why not for all use of XPath 2.0 ?

Where else can this error occur? Most places get their default context
From the default readable port and fail if there is no such port. We
don't require a readable port for xpath-context because it's often
meaningful to have expressions that don't require a context.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Great men too make mistakes, and many
http://nwalsh.com/            | among them do it so often that one is
                              | almost tempted to call them little
                              | men.-- Lichtenberg

Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 20:37:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 July 2008 20:37:24 GMT