On Feb 8, 2008 8:43 AM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > No, but we decided to go ahead anyway because you can always address > that by a) providing a binding for some random namespace to the prefix > you use in your XPath and then b) push it through a namespace-rename > step to change the random namespace to the XProc namespace. Given how > rare a requirement that is, we thought it not worth an additional > language feature to address this. Understood. I think we can live with that. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise Orbeon's Blog: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ Personal Blog: http://avernet.blogspot.com/Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 20:27:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 8 February 2008 20:27:25 GMT