- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:43:54 +0000
- To: "Alessandro Vernet" <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alessandro Vernet writes:
> Does this cover the case where the pipeline author doesn't use the
> XProc namespace in element or attribute names within the p:inline and
> wants the XProc namespace not to be excluded (maybe because it is used
> in an XPath expression in some attribute)?
No, but we decided to go ahead anyway because you can always address
that by a) providing a binding for some random namespace to the prefix
you use in your XPath and then b) push it through a namespace-rename
step to change the random namespace to the XProc namespace. Given how
rare a requirement that is, we thought it not worth an additional
language feature to address this.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHrIbKkjnJixAXWBoRAh4gAJ97xyNG0LyUsum/wTaZsBj+mU0r5wCeOP9x
ARcTbx8X76sAwiV+H23aklE=
=AbsD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 16:44:25 UTC