W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Names for p:* steps

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:05:35 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m23akxexhs.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:

> The step names are "local" in nature - if you import a library in a
> pipeline, the step names are invisible in the target context, so the
> pipeline does not see the names of the imported steps, only their types.
> So, in my opinion, I think that using step types instead of names on the
> command line is more correct.

Maybe that was a brain cramp on my part, remembering how things used
to work with names. Let me think on it some more.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The years teach us much which the days
http://nwalsh.com/            | never knew.-- Emerson

Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 18:06:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:46 UTC