W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Slight inconvenience of using only @select for options

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:24:38 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0804230724x237e836dsa274d670c28fd7df@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Very good question !!!

I think making it an error would allow us to allow it later...but I would be
pleased to allow it right now when XPath 2.0 is selected

On slight thing, how do make the difference between an empty document and an
empty sequence ?

Regards,

Mohamed



On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

> It just occurred to me. In the XPath 2.0 case, do we even *want* it to
> be an error if the context of a select expression is a sequence?
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Time is a great teacher, but
> http://nwalsh.com/            | unfortunately it kills all its
>                              | pupils.-- Berlioz
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:25:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:25:17 GMT