- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:35:30 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Yes. I think I could live with that, but what happens in the following > case: > > <p:declare-step name="main" type="..."> > <p:input port='source'/> > <p:input port='style'/> > <p:output port='result'/> > > <p:xslt> > <p:input port='stylesheet'> > <p:pipe step="main" port="style"/> > </p:input> > </p:xslt> > </p:declare-step> > > The p:xslt step has an unbound parameter input port. Is that an error, > or do we bind it to an empty document? For consistency with document input ports, I would think this is an error. Doesn't this look like a case of "pipeline containing a step whose specified inputs, outputs, and options do not match the signature for steps of that type" (static error err:XS0010)? Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise Orbeon's Blog: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ Personal Blog: http://avernet.blogspot.com/
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:48:39 UTC