W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Scope of step names

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:11:14 +0100 (BST)
To: "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>, "Richard Tobin" <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070920161114.A6E29264319@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

> <step name="A">
>   <step name="inside">...</step>
> </step>
> <step name="B">
>   <step name="inside">...</step>
> </step>
> is allowed by the current spec, not with your change, IMHO

Ok, I was misinterpreting the wording:

> >   The scope of the names of the steps themselves is determined by the
> >   environment of each step. In general, the name of a step, the names of
> >   its sibling steps, the names of any steps that it contains directly,
> >   the names of its ancestors, and the names of its ancestor's siblings
> >   are all in the same scope.

My interpretation was: the first inside is in the same scope as A, the
second is in the same scope as B, and A and B are in the same scope,
so by transitivity the two insides are in the same scope.  I suggest
changing "in the same scope" to "in a common scope".

-- Richard
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 16:11:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC