W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Updated draft (another try at consensus)

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:02:29 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0709110902m79fab69di3c9ae4277d210e2f@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 9/11/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Acting on the assumption that the text I proposed[1] is accepted as an
> improvement, I have added it to the draft[2].
> Furthermore, if I understand correctly[3], it would be an acceptable
> compromise to add the detailed descriptions of what actions are
> required on a step-by-step basis to achieve namespace well-formed
> results as a non-normative appendix.
> If that's the case, I don't see why we can't proceed to Last Call and
> address any informative changes in an appendix (or perhaps even a
> separate WG Note) at some later date.

This is much, much better.

I can certain write up the appendix based on my last proposal if that is
what the WG would like to do.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 16:02:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC