W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: towards consensus on fixup, part 2

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:11:22 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bwsv2e46t.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | It enlighten that serializing the document at each step need to keep
> | some Doctype information, isn'it ?
>
> I think an implementation that chooses to serialize at each step is
> going to find it challenging to preserve attribute type which is why,
> I assume, Henry put it in the "should" pile and not the "must" pile.

Precisely.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG4ZRKkjnJixAXWBoRAjnhAJ4lOySjXdu0q05sZX6U6FVDlUuvVwCfbVit
qfpfnG16gYV/PzaI8xfBd5c=
=Zksz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 18:11:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT