W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: p:label-elements builtin

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:28:49 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2abs0vxqm.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
| Um.  Having one implementation where you can rely on that doesn't seem
| very useful: people will write pipelines that work in your
| implementation and then find they don't work in others.  It's like
| relying on argument evaluation order, or how a++ + a++ comes out in a
| given C compiler.  If there's a need for non-duplication between
| documents it should either be required or there should be a switch to
| guarantee it.

So what do folks think? Sequential numbers, some guarantee of global
uniqueness, or implementation defined?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Who knows whether the best of men be
http://nwalsh.com/            | known? or whether there be not more
                              | remarkable persons forgot, than any
                              | that stand remembered in the known
                              | account of time.--Sir Thomas Browne

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2007 11:28:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT