On 10/14/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > A while back (I'm being lazy on a Sunday morning so I haven't traced > down the minutes), didn't Henry push for a simplified version of > http-request and didn't the WG come to some consensus for that? I don't remember coming to consensus. We allow load to handle schemes like http and https and so you do have a simplified "GET" request. In the end, setting non-standard headers isn't that normal and so for GET, the only real feature I could see that would cause you to have to use http-request over load would be authentication. Of course, there may be other reasons... I think if you start doing POST, HEAD, PUT, or DELETE requests, the need to switch to an XML input is fine and rational. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of MathematicsReceived on Monday, 15 October 2007 16:20:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT