W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Remarques on W3C Editor's Draft 13 November 2007

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:27:59 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0711261327t7234c57bm2dc8fd4a5ef28f95@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On Nov 26, 2007 4:23 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> |> | === p:uuid ===
> |>
> |> I don't understand what you're asking.
> |
> | Well my point was : why isn't just UUID a possible value of the
> | "scheme" option in p:label-elements ?
>
> That would be a new feature, are you suggesting that we should add it?
> UUIDs make for awfully long IDs and the p:uuid step is optional so
> I'd be reluctant to make UUID a required scheme for p:label-elements.
> I'm also reluctant to have some required and some optional schemes.

I understand your point, but since we now have only one XSLT step, I
don't understand to have to create a new step (even optional) instead
of simply adding an optional scheme and avoid multiplication of steps

Mohamed

>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything has been said before, but
> http://nwalsh.com/            | since nobody every listens we have to
>                               | keep going back and beginning all over
>                               | again.--André Gide
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 21:28:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT