W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Remarques on W3C Editor's Draft 13 November 2007

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:23:27 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2tzn9115c.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
|> | === p:uuid ===
|> I don't understand what you're asking.
| Well my point was : why isn't just UUID a possible value of the
| "scheme" option in p:label-elements ?

That would be a new feature, are you suggesting that we should add it?
UUIDs make for awfully long IDs and the p:uuid step is optional so
I'd be reluctant to make UUID a required scheme for p:label-elements.
I'm also reluctant to have some required and some optional schemes.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything has been said before, but
http://nwalsh.com/            | since nobody every listens we have to
                              | keep going back and beginning all over
                              | again.--André Gide

Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 15:23:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:45 UTC