On 5/23/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > I think I'd be OK with allowing the p:http-request step to handle > any protocol it can map to the method requested. That means > that POST/etc. wouldn't be allow for the 'file' scheme but GET, > HEAD, and DELETE would be allowed. I don't disagree, but then the component should be called uri-request rather than http-request. Shouldn't it? Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 11:57:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:52 GMT