W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Types for Option Values

From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:43:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4828ceec0705240443h5e67fbdue70d0fd7f7c4f27b@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 5/23/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
> If we do allow options to be typed in v1, then given we are using XPath
> 1.0 we should stick with the simple types available in XPath 1.0: the
> type attribute could be xs:string, xs:double or xs:boolean. We would
> have to have some wording that stated the values were interpreted
> according to the XSD rules rather than as XPath literals, but that
> shouldn't be too hard. This would give us a clear upgrade path for a
> future version where we might use XPath 2.0.

Simple enough, good enough. That works for me.

Alex
-- 
Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise
http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 11:43:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:52 GMT