Re: The 'secondary' output on the XSLT 1.0 step

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Norm,
|
| I fully agree for XSLT 1.0
| but I want to be sure it will remain for XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0

Yes, definitely. Secondary result documents are part of the XSLT 2.0
spec (are they part of XQuery?).

In fact, I've already implemented them for the XSLT 2.0 step :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is not failure of others to
http://nwalsh.com/            | appreciate your abilities that should
                              | trouble you, but rather your failure to
                              | appreciate theirs.-- Confucius