W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: The 'secondary' output on the XSLT 1.0 step

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:47:40 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0705061347n730739b6l58b7d088f17008aa@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norm,

I fully agree for XSLT 1.0
but I want to be sure it will remain for XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0

Mohamed

On 5/6/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone successfully implemented this? I've looked at the
> implementation of the "output to file" extension functions for Xalan,
> XSLTC, and Saxon 6. None of them seem amenable to making this work.
> I'm not suggesting it couldn't be done, but I don't think it can be
> done without fairly substantial hacking in the core of these tools.
> I'd like ot not set the bar that high for implementors.
>
> The XSLT 1.0 specification does not describe secondary outputs; I'm
> tempted to suggest that we remove it from our XSLT 1.0 component.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The shortness of life can neither
> http://nwalsh.com/            | dissuade us from its pleasures, nor
>                               | console us for its pains.-- Vauvenargues
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 20:47:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:51 GMT