W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Caching

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:38:29 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0703300038u309b6b74hd53189209ae3db47@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 3/29/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | Caching can be about telling to the process, something has already
> | been processed so you don't need to redo it : Fine, that's one
> | interpretation
>
> Our language doesn't do dependency tracking and we've already
> explicitly said that you can't assume that steps are functional and
> side-effect free, so I don't think a conformant app can cache in that
> sense.
>
> | The other one caching of URIReference that says when you overload the
> | URIResolver you can reroute the resolution to something in the pipe or
> | outside
> |
> | Are thoses issues separated ?
>
> They are in my mind.

Ok ! Fine ! So what is the scope of "caching" in this thread ?


>
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 07:38:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT