W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Caching

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:55:39 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87ps6rev6c.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Caching can be about telling to the process, something has already
| been processed so you don't need to redo it : Fine, that's one
| interpretation

Our language doesn't do dependency tracking and we've already
explicitly said that you can't assume that steps are functional and
side-effect free, so I don't think a conformant app can cache in that
sense.

| The other one caching of URIReference that says when you overload the
| URIResolver you can reroute the resolution to something in the pipe or
| outside
|
| Are thoses issues separated ?

They are in my mind.


                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 18:55:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT