W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Ignored namespaces and Ignored prefixes

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:15:18 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87ejn9dt0p.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Dear,
| It is clear, that we need ignored prefixes, but it is unclear at all
| that we need to have already a namespace set in ignored namespaces
| Why is not SVG and MathML also in ? and hundreds of "obvious" others ?
| I really prefer to see none at start

I agree. When the ignored-prefixes was the mechanism for
documentation, putting XHTML in there by default made some sense. Now
that we have p:doc, I don't think it does. (In fact, I almost removed
it in the latest draft but decided that was more than editorial.)

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:15:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:42 UTC