W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Ignored namespaces and Ignored prefixes

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:15:18 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87ejn9dt0p.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Dear,
|
| It is clear, that we need ignored prefixes, but it is unclear at all
| that we need to have already a namespace set in ignored namespaces
|
| Why is not SVG and MathML also in ? and hundreds of "obvious" others ?
|
| I really prefer to see none at start

I agree. When the ignored-prefixes was the mechanism for
documentation, putting XHTML in there by default made some sense. Now
that we have p:doc, I don't think it does. (In fact, I almost removed
it in the latest draft but decided that was more than editorial.)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:15:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT