W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: More notes about the standard components

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:14:21 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0703280614x4ef1553bx54870de42becb168@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 3/28/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | On 3/28/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> |> I suggest that we rename 'join-sequences' to simply 'join'.
> |>
> |> I propose 'split'
> |>
> |>   <p:declare-step type="p:split">
> |>     <p:input port="source" sequence="yes"/>
> |>     <p:output port="*"/>
> |>   </p:declare-step>
> |
> | I'm a little bit doubtful about how you will use this component ?
> | You have to know in advance how many element there is in the sequence, isn'it ?
>
> Brain cramp on my part. This isn't the opposite of join, I guess.
>
> It's more like identity. It produces a copy of its input on each of its
> outputs.


Hum...it's a tee with potentially more than two
ok...split is not sufficiently clear, from this point of vue

What about p:copy ?

But...do we really need it ?

Why not just have multiple inputs referring to a single output ?




>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:14:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT