Re: More notes about the standard components

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| On 3/28/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
|> I suggest that we rename 'join-sequences' to simply 'join'.
|>
|> I propose 'split'
|>
|>   <p:declare-step type="p:split">
|>     <p:input port="source" sequence="yes"/>
|>     <p:output port="*"/>
|>   </p:declare-step>
|
| I'm a little bit doubtful about how you will use this component ?
| You have to know in advance how many element there is in the sequence, isn'it ?

Brain cramp on my part. This isn't the opposite of join, I guess.

It's more like identity. It produces a copy of its input on each of its
outputs.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.